We have observed a decline in reading comprehension across generations. People are reading less, retaining less of what they read, and finding it challenging to engage in critical analysis. If this trend continues, it could threaten the very foundations of our society.

In an era dominated by bite-sized content and viral media, many of us have lost, or are losing, the ability to focus and patiently engage with lengthy and complex texts. We tend to skim and scan instead of reading closely, and our attention spans have shortened to mere seconds. While technology has enabled the widespread dissemination of information, it has also fragmented our thinking. We are inundated with noise and sensationalism.

Clickbait headlines and social media posts often appeal to our emotions rather than our intellect, making us susceptible to misinformation. We sometimes share articles without actually reading them, merely reacting to provocative titles and abstracts. Context, nuance, and accuracy seem to matter less, with objective truth taking a back seat to subjective feelings and impulsive reactions.

Without strong reading comprehension skills, we struggle to thoughtfully process information and make informed decisions. We lose the ability to thoroughly analyze complex issues, think critically, understand diverse perspectives, identify logical fallacies, and weigh evidence. Our opinions become shaped by alarmist rhetoric and confirmation bias rather than factual evidence. We consume information but do not digest it, eroding the foundations of a healthy democracy, which relies on an informed and educated populace.

It may not be accurate to claim that people have completely lost their reading comprehension skills. More precisely, we seem to have forgotten how to apply close reading techniques to modern media. We still possess the basic cognitive abilities, but we often fail to leverage them. Instead of watching, scrutinizing, and questioning politically charged YouTube videos, we react to them impulsively.

Online, we tend to seek out viewpoints that confirm our existing biases rather than considering different perspectives. We allow our thinking to be swayed by loud voices on social media rather than engaging in reasoned discourse. We have become intellectually lazy, neglecting to exercise our critical thinking skills.

Reading is more than just a practical skill; it exposes us to new ideas, cultures, and experiences. Books enable us to envision different lives, expanding our worldviews. Deep, thoughtful reading exercises our mental faculties, fostering focus, analytical skills, and abstract thinking. Reading promotes empathy and compassion, allowing us to gain emotional insights into the human condition. A decline in critical reading inhibits cognitive growth and emotional intelligence.

In the era of AI, some argue that artificial intelligence poses the greatest existential threat of our time. Advanced algorithms can automate jobs, manipulate through deepfakes, and weaponize disinformation. However, AI systems are still created by humans and are limited by the capabilities programmed into them. While AI can be potentially dangerous, it lacks sentience—the ability to think and feel.

In contrast, the decline in critical reading skills poses a significant threat to the sentient minds of billions. These minds design, build, regulate, and use technology for both positive and negative purposes. They make ethical judgments with global consequences. Losing the ability to comprehend the world around us and make sense of complex ideas represents an existential crisis.

No algorithm can replace human wisdom and analytical thinking. However, if we abandon a millennium of critical reading and thinking skills wholesale, no algorithm may need to. Each of us can take steps to read diversely, reflect deeply, and verify claims before spreading them. We can consciously apply critical reading skills to modern media instead of reacting reflexively. However, individual efforts alone may not be sufficient.

The decline in reading comprehension is a multifaceted issue that cannot be reduced to simplistic explanations, such as "technology ruined our attention spans." Placing blame solely on Generation Z ignores the widespread susceptibility to poorly structured misinformation demonstrated by older users who have embraced QAnon.

These oversimplified views fail to capture the nuances of the problem. We cannot ignore the fact that digital platforms now dominate modern media landscapes. While these technologies enable the rapid dissemination of information, they prioritize bite-sized content optimized to grab attention. Algorithms often prioritize sensational clickbait over thoughtful discourse.

Social networks provide fertile ground for misinformation, especially emotionally charged falsehoods. Complex, truthful concepts struggle to break through the noise.

The modern digital media environment trains our brains in ways that run counter to immersive, contemplative reading. The constant stream of stimuli fragments our concentration into tiny shards. We multitask across apps and websites, exposing ourselves to diverse ideas but grasping little. Our attention flits briefly from one post to another without delving deeper into any topic.

App and website designs intentionally exploit our psychological vulnerabilities: features like pull-to-refresh and auto-play exploit our desire for novelty. Notifications interrupt our thoughts with external prompts. Clickbait headlines manipulate our emotions to pique curiosity. Algorithms learn precisely which content keeps us engaged. Our minds become Pavlovian conditioned to crave distraction.

Moreover, this environment often conceals shallow content behind engaging interfaces designed to maximize time spent on the site. We endure tedious, repetitive videos just to see how they conclude. We cannot look away from attractive individuals dispensing trivial advice. Pages filled with ads and trackers diminish our ability to concentrate. Our attention becomes monetized to benefit those who excel at distraction.

In the meantime, lengthy texts filled with substantive information struggle to compete. Their interfaces are not optimized for addiction but for illuminating discourse. They respect readers' agency rather than ensnaring them algorithmically. Their creators prioritize truth over clicks. Yet, these bastions of deep reading feel increasingly foreign to modern minds accustomed to constant sensory stimulation. Their depth requires patience and analytical effort that feels unnatural after years of skimming and scrolling.

Digital media has its merits, exposing people to diverse perspectives they might never encounter otherwise. However, the collateral damage to attention spans is real.

Studies confirm that heavy multitaskers struggle to filter out distractions and focus on demanding tasks. Those who consume significant online media possess broad knowledge but lack depth. Digital natives think and read differently from literate scholars of the past.

While causal links require further research, the correlations are concerning enough to warrant intervention. The very structure of modern media poses a threat to these capabilities, but policy changes, educational reforms, and individual habits can help revive deep reading.

However, it would be